I still stand by the old ethic that the first rule of journalism is accuracy. Many of my colleagues in the media will fiercely nod their heads at this – while most people not in the media will probably just laugh out loud.
The ‘Choppergate’ scandal – as it has become known – is an interesting case in point.
But what I find even more surprising than the fact it happened – is the media’s constant mis-reporting of what exactly the scandal was in the first place.
A quick internet search and you will repeatedly see it described as:
“…two faked live crosses from its news helicopter at the weekend…”
“…journalists embroiled in the “Choppergate” fake live-cross scandal…”
“…journalists involved in faking a live cross to the Nine News chopper…”
They were not “fake” live crosses.